Everton Park Presbyterian Reformed Church

A local friendly reformed church in Everton Park, Brisbane

  • Home
  • Sermons
    • Sermons
    • Series
    • Special Events
      • Bible Conference 2012
      • Camp 2013
      • Church Camp 2019
You are here: Home / Archives for CFIT

Covenant Friendship

June 12, 2015 by CFIT

Recently I read Tim Challies‚ review of the book Spiritual Friendship by Wesley Hill. Wesley Hill is single and laments how hard it is to form good Christian friendships that last. Part of the problem is that we live in an increasingly mobile society; people regularly ‚move on‚ even when they don‚t move away. Tim Challies asks, ‘Have you ever had a friendship that entered into irrevocable decline because your friend just up and moved away? Have you ever had a friendship that ended over matters of convenience or preference? My guess is that most of us have experienced something like this at one time or another. And I wonder if this is an inevitable part of friendship, or whether it may just be a sign that we take friendship too lightly.‘

Wesley Hill notes how, for some, friendship is ‘based, above all, on personal preference’; and that in ‚preserving its voluntary character‚ it becomes ‘vulnerable at every point to dissolution if one of the friends grows tired of or burdened by the relationship.’ He goes on to wonder whether we shouldn’t ‘consider friendship more along the lines of how we think of marriage’, i.e. ‘as more stable, permanent, and binding than we often do‚ should we begin to consider at least some of our friends as, in large measure, tantamount to family?’  This will not sit well with today’s individualistic focus in society; as Hill notes: ‘If your deepest fulfilment is found in personal autonomy, then friendship is more of a liability than an asset.’

Challies makes an interesting observation regarding our focus as churches. He asks, ‘Have Protestants, with all our emphasis on marriage and family, neglected friendship?‘ This is a good point. Those who are happily married can be blissfully unaware of the deep pain and loneliness that single people (unmarried, widowed, divorced) or those unhappily married can feel. Challies comments: ‘We all know that the strength of marriage is its bond, the commitment of one spouse to another through any and every circumstance, ’til death do us part. Is it possible that our friendships remain insignificant because they require so much less and can be dissolved on a whim?‘

Is there room for a form of ‚covenant friendship‚ that would provide stability in a relationship similar to that in a happy marriage? The answer to that question is, ‘yes’. It is called covenant church membership. Covenant church membership (where it operates as it should) provides ‘covenant friendship’ for all who are part of that church family. We covenant to ‘serve in and contribute joyfully to the worship and work of [our church] to the best of our ability.‘ Also, ‘to love each brother or sister in Christ [in our church]; and to encourage and pray for them in their Christian walk and witness.‘

Can it be that single people are lonelier today because so many churches have given up on covenant membership? While those of us who are in churches that have covenant membership need to take it more seriously? Covenant membership means covenant friendship; it means we don‚t give up on each other when we get irritated or let down, or ‘get a better offer elsewhere‘‚ we are there for each other no matter what (Colossians 3:12-15, 1 John 3:18). Let us continually renew our vows to be faithful to God. But also, to one another. Let us recommit to covenant friendship in the family of our church.

Filed Under: Blogs by Ken Tagged With: church, church membership, commitment, covenant membership, friendship, loneliness, Love, Marriage

Knowing God

May 22, 2015 by CFIT

A new series at Kallangur on ‘Getting to Know God’. Come a long to find out more about God, and what Heis like. Some topics include:

  • God the creator
  • God with us
  • God is holy
  • God provides
  • God is faithful
  • God makes it right
  • God is good
  • God of power
  • God is love
  • God is unchangeable

The sermon series is available below.

Filed Under: Sermon Blogs Tagged With: 2015, Creation, Faithful, God, Goodness, Holiness, Holy, KBT, Ken Stebbins, Ken Zylstra, Love, Michael Dogger, Peter Whan, Sermon Series, Unchangeable

Have Evangelicals lost sight of the Trinity?

May 8, 2015 by CFIT

A thoughtful comment by Rev Chris Balzer, a former moderator of the Presbyterian Church of New South Wales. This article originally appeared in ‚AP‚ (Australian Presbyterian)
It was a January about four decades ago when my wife, our small children and I were on our annual vacation ‚ travelling by car and camping. One Saturday evening we ended up in a small Victorian country town. A quick survey of the town told us that there was one Protestant church there that might be OK for us on Sunday.
We turned up in good time to discover a notice on the closed church door to say that we should go to the river where there was to be a baptism ‚ so we did. The only thing that I remember about that service was chat the pastor baptised only in the name of Jesus. I was shocked. Didn‚t he know the contents of Matthew 28:18-20? Was he Trinitarian? I don‚t know because I consider it impolite for a visitor to engage in a theological debate with the pastor after church.
All I could think of that day were the words of our Lord Jesus Christ: And Jesus came and said to them, ‚All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.‚
In my church experience since that memorable day, I have noticed a discernible trend for many Evangelicals perhaps to be Trinitarian in theory but ‚Jesus only‚ in practice. This can often be seen in the prayers in public worship, and in a neglect, almost an avoidance, of mentioning the Trinity in any way in the sermons. Certainly whole sermons on the Trinity are extremely rare in my experience.
Is this because we Evangelicals are now embarrassed by the doctrine of the Trinity, or is it perhaps because we can‚t get our minds around the subject and are functional Unitarians? Contrast this with the stance of the Unitarians, the Jehovah‚s Witnesses, the Christadelphians and the Mormons. They are not embarrassed in being Unitarian. In fact, they are quite proud of their theological position.
In my experience in the Presbyterian Church of Australia, I have met, unfortunately, a few ministers who had great trouble handling the Old Testament, and therefore hardly ever dealt with it. One even said to me, sad to report, that the God of the Old Testament is a different God to the God of the New Testament. Functionally, he was following the early Church heretic Marcion, and metaphorically cut out of his Bible those parts which, in his mind, did not fit with the ‚Gentle Jesus, meek and mild‚ idea of the deity.
It seems to me that only if a Christian is thoroughly Trinitarian can he or she handle the ideas which we find in both testaments. The God of the Old Testament is the same God as the God of the New Testament. The Trinitarian God created the universe; the Trinitarian God led God‚s people out of Egypt; the Trinitarian God was there and active in the New Testament period; the Trinitarian God is here and active today.
One advantage of being relatively old in the tooth is that I have seen and been involved in Evangelicalism for about 55 years and have seen many trends and various moves in one direction or the other. An advantage of being a Confessional Evangelical is that I have had the early church creeds and the Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms to consult which can act as a corrective if I go off on this theological tangent or that. I pray that this applies to you also.
Why was it that the early Church Fathers and, after them, the Reformers, wrote things like the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds, and the following: ‚In the unity of the Godhead there are three persons, having one substance, power, and eternity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. The Father exists. He is not generated and does not come from any source. The Son is eternally generated from the Father, and the Holy Spirit eternally comes from the Father and the Son‚ (Westminster Confession of Faith, ch. 2 para 3)
Is the current trend that I see a result of a neglect of the reciting the Apostles‚ or Nicene Creed in our services of public worship? Perhaps. Certainly I think that those of us who grew up reciting these early church statements of faith had more difficulty being functionally non-Trinitarian. We may never have understood completely the ins and outs of the doctrine of the Trinity, but we were in no doubt of the historic Christian position on the nature of the Godhead. We were then driven to read what we could on the subject, to think about the inter-relationship of the Old and New Testaments, and consciously to drive our thinking in a Trinitarian direction.
If you agree with my observations about the current state of Evangelical Christianity, what can we do about this situation? A good start, I suggest, is that those of us given the great privilege of leading congregational prayers on a Sunday morning or evening consciously pray using Trinitarian language.
Have you ever tried praying to God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, and then summing up with words like ‚Oh Trinitarian God, please be with us, save your people, sanctify us truly, lead us in the way of righteousness‚. This performs a dual purpose: it concentrates the mind of the person leading the prayers and also the minds of those present who are invited to say ‚ÄòAmen‚ at the end.
Now, we and they will inevitably have questions in our minds about how the Trinity works in practice. This should drive us to read more on the subject. In my reading of recent years, I have found extremely helpful a little book by Tim Chester, Delighting in the Trinity. And guess what the sub-title is: ‚Why Father, Son and Spirit are Good News.‚ Buy it, try it. Your thinking might be changed.

Filed Under: Blogs by Ken Tagged With: 2015, Balzer, baptism, Marcion, Presbyterian, Tim Chester, Trinity, Westminster Confession

GOD LOVES YOU‚ more or less

May 1, 2014 by CFIT

A half-truth that has gained traction in recent times is: ‚God could not love you any more; nor could He love you any less.‚

Now, I delight in the precious truth which assures me of Christ‚s personal and intimate love for me, i.e. that, ‚the Son of God‚ loved me and gave Himself for me.‚ Gal 2:20 I would not have endured in my Christian life, let alone in the ministry, had I not been ‚persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.‚ Rom 8:38-39

But to say that: ‚God could not love me any more; nor could He love me any less‚ is misleading ‚ because the Bible plainly says that how we conduct ourselves in this life does (in some way) affect the way God loves us. Eg. Jesus told us, ‚He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him‚ (John 14:21). Again: ‚If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.‚ (John 14:23 ‚ I love this last part). And again, ‚If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father‚s commandments and abide in His love‚ (John 15:10). Also Jude tells us to ‚keep yourselves in the love of God‚ especially by: ‚building ourselves up on our most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, and looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.‚

Those who teach, ‚God could not love you any more; nor could He love you any less‚ miss the point of verses like this. For the most part they are well-meaning. There has been renewed interest in the doctrines of grace in recent years, and many have been zealous to insist that we must maintain that salvation is all of God alone, and nothing of us. But some have deduced from this that God‚s love for us must be all of Him alone; it must have nothing to do with our works.

The danger here is that we fall into the error of Antinomianism. This was an error that emerged when the church rediscovered the doctrines of grace at the time of the Reformation. Antinomianism was not, as the name might suggest (anti nomos = ‚against law‚), an outright rejection of God‚s Law (none but the most extreme Antinomians taught this), so much as a rejection of the Law as being any longer binding on the Christian, or that our keeping the law has any effect on our relationship with God. It was argued that, if we are justified by grace, apart from the deeds of the law, we are no longer under any obligation to keep God‚s law. And since as Christians, our works (it is supposed) cannot please God anyway, He cannot love us any more when we obey His law, than when we don‚t.

The most dangerous errors are the most subtle, especially when we take God‚s truth and push it to an extreme. We are like Christian walking a narrow path through the Valley of the Shadow of Death where ‚there was on the right hand a very DEEP DITCH: that ditch is it into which the blind have led the blind in all ages, and have both there miserably perished. Again, behold, on the left hand, there was a very DANGEROUS QUAG [quagmire, bog], into which, if even a good man falls, he can find no bottom for his foot to stand on.‚ Andronicus, in his commentary on Bunyan‚s Pilgrim‚s Progress, warns: ‚Reflect that the path which the gospel marks out, is the middle line between [Legalism] and Antinomianism: in other words, in ascribing to the Law too much, or too little.‚ The path we tread is a narrow one, and no sooner do we take care to avoid the ditch of Legalism on one side, than we are in danger of falling into the bottomless bog of Antinomianism on the other.

Today, as at the Reformation, the emergence of (the New) Calvinism has also seen the rise of the New Antinomianism. Once again there are those who are teaching that Christians, saved by grace, are not under obligation to keep God‚s Law. They reject that: ‚The moral law doth forever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof‚ Neither doth Christ in the gospel any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.‚ And that, ‚Although true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned; yet is it of great use to them, as well as to others; in that, as a rule of life informing them of the will of God and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly‚‚ (Westminster Confession ch 19.5,6) But when we truly understand the place of the Law in the Christian‚s sanctification, we are able genuinely to rejoice to know that God does love us more when we obey His law (and, yes, love us less when we disobey).

But how does this work, if ultimately our salvation depends on the electing love of God, and the sacrifice of Christ ‚ both of which have nothing to do with us? Doesn‚t the Bible say,‚God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us‚ (Rom 5:8)? Here, we need to keep in view the distinction, in Scripture, between the electing love of God that chose us to salvation; and the delighting love of God that takes delight in His children as they obey Him.

1) When it comes to the ‚electing love‚ of God, this never varies: that love could never be more and never less. In the end it is God‚s electing love alone, that ultimately determines that we are saved (i.e. justified), and that sent Christ to die for us. This in no way depends upon our works; justification is all of God alone. It is like the underlying love of a father, or mother, for their children: that is a love that will never cease, however much the child might rebel; the father is still the father and the child is always his child.

2) But when it comes to how God ‚delights in‚ His children, that certainly varies according to how we walk pleasing before Him. Sanctification is a work of co-operation between God and the believer, as the believer responds to God‚s Spirit. By the help of God‚s Spirit, we really are able to do good works that God, ‚looking upon them in His Son, is pleased to accept and reward [as] that which is sincere, although accompanied with many weaknesses and imperfections.‚ (Westminster Confession 16.6) God really is ‚well pleased‚ with us when we do good works (see eg. Rom 12:1-2, 14:18, 2 Cor 5:9, Eph 5:10, Phil 4:18, Col 3:20, Heb 13:21). It is like a parent who takes a warmer delight in his love for his child when the child is willing, cheerful and obedient.

‚The Lord takes pleasure in His people; He will beautify the humble with salvation.‚ Psa 149:4 How great to know that God does take pleasure in us and in our good works ‚ even though we, and they, are imperfect.

For an excellent discussion of this get hold of Mark Jones‚ ‚Antinomianism: Reformed Theology‚s Unwelcome Guest‚. In that book he deals thoughtfully with other issues like: Law and Gospel, Good Works and Rewards, The Basis of Assurance‚ etc Highly Recommended.

Filed Under: Blogs by Ken Tagged With: Antinomianism, election, good works, Law, love of God, Mark Jones, New Calvinism, sanctification

God Loves You and Has a Wonderful Plan for Your Church

June 7, 2013 by CFIT

We have heard a lot, in recent years, how ‚God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life.‚ And He does ‚ if you are right with Him through faith Jesus Christ (Rom 8:28). (It‚s not so ‚wonderful‚ if you refuse faith in Jesus Christ; in fact, it is rather dreadful.) But did you know that God loves your church (Eph 5:25) and has a wonderful plan for your church?

That plan finds its highest goal when ‚the God of patience and comfort‚ grants us that ‚with one mind [lit. with one passion‚] and one mouth [we] glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ‚ (Rom 15:6). And, when ‚the God of hope‚ ‚fills [us] with all joy and peace in believing, that [we] may abound in hope by the power of the Holy Spirit‚ (Rom 15:13). God‚s purpose for us as a church is to ‚glorify‚ and ‚enjoy‚ Him.

This: not just as individuals, but together. We fulfil God‚s purpose for us as a church when we glorify and really enjoy Him ‚with one passion‚, and worship Him ‚with one mouth‚. Paul Barnett comments: ‚Common and united worship in the one body of the crucified but risen Christ, notwithstanding the differences that otherwise would divide, is [the] great goal for believers.‚

But sadly, the church(es) in Rome that Paul wrote to were divided. They were divided along the lines of cultural differences between Jew and Gentile. Jews condemned Gentiles, and Gentiles mocked Jews. Jewish Christians despised Gentiles as disobedient, because they didn‚t keep up with the religious ceremonies prescribed in the Old Testament. Gentile Christians, with their ‚superior‚ understanding that such ceremonies were no longer necessary (see Acts 10) mocked their Jewish counterparts. (This forms the backdrop to Rom 14)

Similar problems arise in the church today. Probably not over pork ‚ everyone (it seems) likes bacon now. But there are other cultural issues which can divide churches today. Such as music. Whole cultures develop around music today. Churches divide along the fault lines of these cultures.

It is not that we can be careless in such matters; or that it should be open slather. Even the most broad-minded Gentile Christian‚s eating habits still needed some regulation: just because he could ‚eat anything‚ (or, so he thought) didn‚t mean it was O.K. for him, eg. to take drugs. There are still limits as to what New Testament Christians should do, or not do ‚ yes, even in matters of ‚Christian liberty.‚ Some of those limits are common sense; some may even become a matter of right and wrong (note Paul‚s: ‚when you thus sin‚‚ in dealing with matters of Christian liberty in 1 Cor 8:12). The same is true when it comes to other cultural issues that arise in churches, such as music.

But when churches divide over this, or any other culture-related issue, it is sad. Paul prayed that the culturally divided Christians in Rome would ‚with one passion and with one mouth glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.‚ It is contrary to God‚s wonderful purpose for His church to divide over these issues.

Here are eight rules, in four pairs, as to how can we can deal with issues like this so that we don‚t divide over them.

1. Two ‚Don‚t‚s

1) Don‚t Dispute (Rom 14:1). NIV: ‚‚without quarrelling over disputable matters‚. ESV ‚‚not to quarrel over opinions.‚ Rather ‚receive‚, or ‚welcome‚ the one with whom you differ. ‚The Message‚ translation: ‚Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don‚t see things the way you do. And don‚t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don‚t agree with.‚ Distinguish between what is essential, and what is non-essential.

2) Don‚t Despise (Rom 14:3). Don‚t despise someone who may represent a different culture. It could be in something like music. Or it could be in any one of a number of areas where, culturally, we differ from one another. Don‚t make fun of their opinion, don‚t put them down.

2. Two ‚Be‚s

1) Be: Fully Convinced in Your Own Mind (Rom 14:5). Be fully persuaded in your own mind as to what you believe on these things. Don‚t feel threatened because someone is fully persuaded in his mind a different way. We can react like that: we can think that if a person has a different opinion to us, then he‚ll think I am wrong ‚ until we can prove to him that I am right. So we expend extraordinary amounts of energy trying to prove him wrong. We don‚t have to do that: we can hold differing opinions (Rom ch 14) and still ‚glorify God with one passion and one mouth‚ (Rom 15:6). But:

2) Be: Focused on the Main Thing (Rom 14:8-9). What is the main thing? That ‚whether we live or die, we are the Lord‚s‚ because ‚to this end Christ died and rose and lived again, that He might be Lord of both the dead and the living.‚ Paul spells out what is ‚of first importance‚ in 1 Cor 15:1ff. We are not at liberty to hold differing opinions when it comes to the main thing: i.e. the central truths of the gospel. Nor are we at liberty to hold all sorts of views as to whether or not we will obey Christ‚s Word in the Bible, including keeping God‚s commandments. Eg. see Rom 13:8-9

3. Two ‚Please‚s

1) Seek Not to Please Yourself (Rom 15:1) Yes, even if this means you forgo ‚rights‚ and ‚privileges‚ such as Paul refers to in Rom 14:20-21. You might think it the end of the world to have to give up your bacon, or whatever: ‚Why should I ‚ just because it makes my guest feel uncomfortable? He‚ll just have to get over it.‚ But, giving up our ‚rights‚ is at the heart of ‚not pleasing self‚.

2) Seek to Please Others (Rom 15:2) This is not a matter of ‚men-pleasing‚ (eg. Col 3:22), which in any case is ultimately about self-serving. But this is about ‚pleasing‚ others so that it genuinely helps them (‚for his good, leading to edification‚). What do we have to guide us?

4. Two Directions

1) Imitate the Example of Christ (Rom 15:3) Paul quotes from Psa 69:9, ‚Zeal for Your house has eaten me up, and the reproaches of those who reproach You have fallen on me.‚ Christ suffered much for the sake of ‚God‚s house‚. If Christ could be patient and suffer such great things for the sake of God‚s house, surely we can be prepared to give up a little for the sake of God‚s house (His church) today. Follow the example of Jesus: the ‚Servant King‚

2) Immerse Yourself in the Word of God (Rom 15:4) Paul found direction in the example of Christ, which he discovered from reading God‚s Word. That is where we learn to be ‚patient‚ in our relationships with each other, and find ‚comfort‚ in our relationships with each other.

‚May the God of patience and comfort grant you‚ the patience and comfort [that comes from your study of the Scriptures] that you might have hope.‚

‚May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that you may abound in hope by the power of the Holy Spirit.‚

And, may we all, ‚with one passion and one mouth glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.‚

Filed Under: Blogs by Ken Tagged With: Christ, Christian liberty, church, culture, divisions, example, music, plan, unity

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

© 2025 · Hosted by R6 Digital